Lawsuits in the United States are often filed with the intention of changing current laws or overturning them. A current lawsuit, Ferrer v. United States, could potentially disrupt the US tax system, as it argues that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) should not collect taxes from certain private citizens. With such a profound claim, understanding the facts behind the lawsuit is crucial. At the center of the debate is the US tax code and the private citizens involved. According to the suit, the taxpayer’s argument is that the IRS is only legally allowed to collect taxes from certain persons. Specifically, the claim is that the IRS is not authorized to collect taxes from private citizens, as they are not federal, state, or municipal officials. Moreover, the taxpayer argues that their claim is supported by the 10th Amendment of the US Constitution. However, the defendants in the case are citing several laws that they feel show that the IRS is authorized to collect taxes from private citizens. Among these is the Internal Revenue Code, which states that the IRS may collect taxes from any person with income taxable under this code. Further, the defendants argue that the 10th Amendment of the US Constitution does not provide a basis for this suit, as it does not specify who the government may tax. Such argument and counter-arguments have left it up to the court to decide who is in the right. The judge’s ruling has the potential to greatly impact the US tax system, which is why this case is receiving a lot of attention. At this point, the case is still ongoing, with no resolution in sight. It will be interesting to see how the court decides, and whether or not the US tax system will be disrupted as a result. For now, it is important to pay attention to the facts of the case and the arguments presented by both sides. It is also important to remember that the ultimate fate of the US tax system rests in the hands of the court.